1.1.2 Step-by-step execution of the ISO 8502-6 and 8502-9 test requirements introduces a number of potential variances during the field evaluation. Some examples include the sensitivity and resolution of the conductivity meter, cycle time of the test water inside the Bresle patch, human errors in measuring and injecting the test water, and general operator experience. It is known that the accumulation of these individual process variances can add up to create an overall variance in the ISO protocol.
1.1.3 The range of variance in ISO 8502-6 and 8502-9 has been demonstrated by extensive laboratory tests conducted by a member of this task group.3 The precision of a single ISO 8502-9 test result was determined to be ±8.2 mg/m2 in the range 30 to 80 mg/m2. The absolute variance, and not the relative or percent variance, was found to be constant in this range. See Appendix B (nonmandatory) for details about these tests and the data analysis. The test method defined in ISO 8502-9 allows certain execution parameters of the test (e.g., size of adhesive patch, volume of test solution, and time of dissolution of salts inside the adhesive patch: the dwell time) to vary. This standard adopted best practices and has set the parameters in Appendix A. With a dwell time at a minimum of 90 seconds, the variance from operator error was found reduced dramatically in case the operator timing is not perfect. Hence, a dwell time of 90 seconds was adopted in Appendix A. For the purpose of defining equivalence, the procedure in Appendix A shall be used to create the reference values to which the candidate method will be validated. See Appendix B for the test rationale.
1.1.4 Any equivalent tools, methods, or procedures then must show that they meet the same criteria, thereby providing the same weight measures, and be within the same range of variance as would be produced by following the procedure in ISO 8502-9.
1.1.5 The objective of this standard is to determine whether methods other than the Bresle patch application method are suitable alternatives for measuring salt contamination in the field. Although tests may be performed on flat, horizontal surfaces for ease of use, each method should also be capable of gathering measurements on vertical and overhead surfaces. When such measurements cannot be made on vertical or overhead surfaces, this limitation must be noted in the validation report (Section 3).